A salary was never specified in the documents my mom prepared before her stroke. My mom was organized, and had prepared these documents in case. They proved necessary, as she had a stroke almost 6 years ago. She named my oldest sister the POA. I'll call her "S". There are 4 of us girls. That just made sense since "S" was the oldest and lived closest. Although my mom is in a 24 hour/7 day a week nursing facility, the POA ("S") asked my 2nd oldest sister, ("D"), if she could receive a salary for her time. We were all distraught and of course "D" was happy that "S" was close in distance to be able to help my mom, and so of course said yes. The third oldest sister, ("L"), and me ("B"), were never consulted, so now "S" has been taking a salary for almost 6 years. "S" claims that maybe she hasn't been taking it the whole time, or maybe she just takes it when she needs it, but we have NO visibility and are left frustrated. My mom has a sizable estate, and we have NO idea what "S" has been doing. "D" and "B" (me) have been asking for copies of the financial records for months, maybe years. We know for a fact that my mom has listed all 4 of us as equal beneficiaries in her will, but we're afraid that "S" is decimating the estate, and using the funds however she sees fit, rather than discussing them with us. "S" is angry that we are even discussing money since my mom is still alive. She feels that we care more about the money than about my mom which is ludicrous. "S" is probably being responsible, but don't we have a right to know what is going on since we are beneficiaries of the estate? Since "S" won't share any of the financials, it gives us the impression that she is hiding something. What do we do?
.
Still, I'd hate to be the mother and learn that 3 of my daughters are more concerned with the money the other daughter is getting to be caregiver on the spot, than they are with me.
There are also too many inconsistencies in this post to be sympathetic to the 3 daughters.
Has anyone else noticed also that Alarmed states in her profile that she's caring for her mother in a nursing home, when she's actually some distance away?
While both my brothers can annoy the hell out of me - one for lack of involvement, the other for over involment but reading this thread has made me realize I've got it pretty good. Maybe the POA sister could have handled things differently - maybe not. But without knowing both sides it's impossible to tell. Im just counting my blessings at this point!
If Alarmed is still around, she could well take advice from your experiences.
As you know my situation is similar to Alarmed's. But I was the 24/7 caregiver for Mom at home, and sib POA was rarely available for anything. And the court battle because she was concerned about paying me to provide care because then there would be less left for her when Mom passed. Yes, I actually have an e-mail that she states she wants to be fair, but mom wanted money left for all of us. Absurd! Just so ugly, especially how sisters can get!
If I were you, I would be grateful for the thought and time that the many posters have given you on this board. The responders are not clairvoyant.
Unless you are bedridden, I wonder about the reasons as to why you have not visited your sister while you have been concerned. Flying is not the only wa y to travel across the country.
I manage the household affairs of my SO. It is not an easy job and takes at least 1.5 hrs/day. Now I am considering seeking a financial conservator for his messy financial affairs. His sons have abandoned him because he is so stubborn.
If this issue is sufficiently important to you both, then hire an attorney. You can pay them on a credit card. FYI a mediator does not represent your interests exclusively, unless he is acting in that capacity.
If there were any justice ALL the money would be spent on the provision of the very best in care
I said to do the math, and pams obliged, but in the end will they will still probably believe that somehow the money is lining the POA's pockets.
Rainmom is right too; if they go the legal route and the court appoints they will find out who the big boys/girls are and what a huge salary really is, because with that level of mistrust the courts will appoint a legal eagle not a family member for sure.
As for the car - words still fail me - did they expect the sibling to get on the bus or hitchhike when there was a perfectly good usable car sat in the garage? Perhaps they expected her to sell it and split the money 4 ways? never gonna happen - the money would have to have gone into the estate it was not theirs to have.
I understand the frustrations of financial difficulty I really really do trust me but to take that out on a sibling who is doing the lions share of the work as she is visiting and is nearest just adds to her stress - Perhaps she should sue them for harassment?
Our mom had a massive stroke 6 years ago. We have traveled many times to visit, to help, to support, to do whatever was needed. This involves an expense, involves using whatever small amount of vacation we may have, and of course dealing with the completely stressed out POA during the visit. We go to help and to try to bring love to our mom. When both Alarmedtoo and I made an offer to move my mom closer to either of us, it was early on, before she became attached to the people who help her in the nursing home 24/7. We wanted the chance to see my mom more and help more, but what you’re missing is that the POA “IS” a control freak or loves the feeling of being in charge, even at times controlling who can visit my mom without the POAs supervision. At the time we offered to move her, it was “NOT NEGOTIABLE”, and neither of us pursued it further since the POA insisted on having it her way. As jeannegibbs stated, those attitudes don't win friends and influence family, but they are not illegal. Maybe the solution you’re suggesting would be to quit our jobs, sell our house, and move closer to our mom.
The whole issue with the car was just to try to understand what information we are allowed to have access to. I guess if I was POA, I would want to make sure that no one thought I was “lining my pockets”, and it would be clear what $’s were coming in and going out. This is what I call transparent. When we try to discuss the financial information even a tiny bit, we get stonewalled, which is why the car issue became big. It isn’t about how much one sister has or how much another sister doesn’t have. It is about being fair and even handed, which is what my mother would want. The POA gave up her own car lease, and took a practically new car at the time, saving $18-$24,000. This is pretty huge in my mind, but this is only what we know about. We are not being vindictive, however there are many things that are being done in “my mom’s best interest”, that seem sketchy. So should we continue to just shut up because the POA feels that she doesn’t need to communicate? We have not harassed anyone ohJude. If anything, receiving a letter from a lawyer would be considered harassment. You mentioned APS. What is that?
I saw it when family members of my wife were "looking after" her father and living with him. Took almost a year to find out it was my FIL supporting them!
I also hope that the person who did do the care was in their words stressed is not on this site.
You said ‘
she's been doing the majority of the work,……We’ve been praising her for years and thanking her.
To her face maybe but not in real terms
You also said ‘ have traveled many times to visit, to help, to support, to do whatever was needed. This involves an expense, involves using whatever small amount of vacation we may have, and of course dealing with the completely stressed out POA during the visit. ‘
I will grant that she has not behaved in what I would consider an appropriate manner with regard to communication she is probably feeling that she is under interrogation but thanks just doesn't cut it. Going to help, really help, means giving that sister a complete break. instead you didn't because if you had you would not have been ‘dealing’ with her - a phrase incidentally I find intensely offensive….you couldn't even say ‘our sister’ you said the POA like she is someone totally alienated from you and I imagine that is JUST who she feels
You went to visit. But you aren’t acknowledging that she had to prepare for that visit and was probably knocked sideways by the preparation. You may take it in your stride, your sister clearly didn't - all marks of anxiety and stress and probably depression too. You are not seeing this and then you suggest taking Mum away from her - you may have had best intentions but your sister may well have read that as I am a failure
Of course calling your sibling a control freak doesn't really help the matter either. I control who can visit Mum entirely - I am not a control freak I just wont have Mum upset and if someone HAS to visit who WILL upset her (usually a doctor or one particular relative. My brother is forbidden to visit because he is a risk to her well being and thats a court decision I might add) I don't have a problem insisting they come at a time that suits me. I will damned well be there to support my Mum and to hell with what anyone thinks about that. That is about actually caring for my Mums well being so don't dismiss it as being a control freak in ALL cases. Please note I also live with my Mum so I am usually available but I wont be pushed into times that don’t suit our routine for it is routine that keeps ME sane
If your sibling (and I do mean IF your sibling) has been acting correctly, and lets just assume this for the moment even if you don't agree, then I imagine as she is stressed out she would see having extra duties thrust on her by you as the straw she is not prepared to put on her back
The whole issue of the car and the ‘lining of pockets’ (gosh I hate that term too) you say is about being fair and even handed. There was an almost new car available and noone was using it. Then why shouldn’t your sibling use it to go visit your Mum as much as she probably does (given her ‘control freak’ nature). It IS in your Mums best interests to have visitors it IS in your Mums best interests that a POA visits to ensure money is being spent wisely and that Mum is getting the care that is being paid for. Can she use it outside that? Of course she can that is reasonable. What isn't reasonable is that she should hire or buy one when one is sat there doing nothing. If she had sold it you would not have benefited and your sister would have been put under more pressure
Why do you think she invoked the use of a lawyer if she didn't feel harassed? A letter from a lawyer would not say back off - it would explain why….
IF you think she is misappropriating funds then call in the APS and I would support that 2000% never mind 100%. Be aware that it may cost a lot of money to have the finances investigated BUT if your sister IS taking money out that she shouldn't be, and I have to say that without a contract signed by you all she is on dodgy ground, then she needs to be shown for the thief/fraudster you believe her to be and dealt with by the authorities as such for financial abuse is a criminal offence, make no mistake about it
I can also tell you something else - the court will almost certainly appoint someone else to preside over your mother’s affairs and that will really cost so you need to weigh up what you want to do.
For me mediation would be the only route I would consider whereby you ask to see the financials every 6 months or every year, or offer input to help your sister prepare the financial returns to the tax man. or suggest that an accountant takes over this role and provides you all with a financial breakdown each year.
Finally let me address one paragraph
Maybe the solution you’re suggesting would be to quit our jobs, sell our house, and move closer to our mom. -
Absolutely not - there isn't one person on here who would advocate that - you all have your own lives to live.
I'm wondering about the dynamic among the four of you. Did all three of the non-POAs spontaneously begin to suspect misdealing or did one of you bring the idea to the others? Where is the third non-POA sister in this tangle? We haven't heard from her or about her.
Also, why did the POA sister refer the rest of you to the lawyer? If the POA is comfortable bringing an attorney into it, it sounds like her conscience is clear. It also sounds as if somebody must have made a pretty powerful accusation or threat against her to make her feel she needed the lawyer's backup. Or must have nagged at her beyond endurance.
Good luck.