I spoke several times with the speech therapist about taking him off purée food since he was only supposed to be on for a few weeks. After a few months she finally put him on mechanical food after running more tests. He hates it and lost so much weight, he doesn’t eat as much. When I bring him home made food he eats with no problem like he’s starving to death. I told the therapist he wants to be on regular food and he doesn’t want your mechanical food. The therapist gets loud and refuses to take him off. What are our rights? I asked her repeatedly and this time she just came out and treated me like a child and rudely said NO.
He may be in a stage of swallowing difficulty where he can handle normal food especially if it's accompanied by something sweet. That may eventually stop working as it did in our case and you will have to turn to puree food strictly. You need to prepare for that eventuality.
My mother suffered an ischemic stroke and lost the swallowing reflex. I cannot imagine a thickened water. Wow. So sad. Prayers to you.
Any diet can be turned into mechanical soft. The food you cook for him can be turned into mechanical soft. You are not complaining about the diet but rather the texture.
Recognize that if your father eats regular texture food that he may choke.
The speech therapist is acting on her assessment that your father is at risk for aspiration if he eats unaltered food. She is required to make recommendations in accordance with her professional standards.
At the same time, if your father does not have cognitive problems, and can understand the risks, he can choose to not follow those recommendations. If you are his legal agent, and understand the risks, you can act on his behalf and not follow recommendations.
Certainly, aspiration is very serious and can lead to death. Significant weight loss is also very serious and can lead to death. Also to be considered is that restrictive diets contribute to depression and to weight loss.
The issue becomes a matter of quality of life.
Everyone (whether in a nursing home or not) has the right to refuse treatment/recommendations. We may not agree, but it is the same as a person declining to stop smoking, lose weight, accept chemotherapy, etc., etc. Federal (and state regulations) include this in the rights, in no uncertain terms. Nursing homes have been cited for not complying with the regulations regarding rights to refuse treatment.
So, do we force people to do what we recommend to prolong life? Will he die from malnutrition or possibly aspiration?
One of my residents was in a similar situation. He had a feeding tube because of aspiration. After some months, he refused to allow us to use the feeding tube because he wanted to eat. His doctor refused to write an order for him to eat. He continued to refuse the tube feeding and rapidly lost weight. A different physician (a geriatrician) with more authority recognized his right to choose, and wrote the order for him to eat whatever he desired. The resident was never able to eat enough to be healthy, but he was satisfied that he was able to at least take a few bites of the foods he enjoyed. He never did aspirate after we reinstated his diet.
However, a feeding tube should be the LAST resort. If she were cognizant, which she was not, I would respect and do whatever she wanted. However, since she was not cognizant, I had to make decisions for her to avoid suffering. Dehydration would have caused a lot of suffering, which was why I got one put in her. Note it can take 2 to 3 weeks to die of dehydration, and morphine will not make it any easier.
Prior to that I fed her very slowly. It took about 1-1/2 hours per meal including thickened liquids fed one teaspoon at a time. mom never had a problem aspirating. Her chest x-rays were always clear.
Aspiration is very dangerous and a very common demise of people with Parkinsons and Alzheimer's disease. The therapist's advise should be followed, but I fed mom beans mixed with peanut butter which was easily mashable, along with ice cream and protein shakes.
Feeding tubes should not be taken lightly. They need a lot of care. I do mean a lot. They CAN aspirate if caution is not used.
1. Has the therapist found a swallowing impairment? Yes. She is therefore correct to prescribe a modified diet, to reduce the risk of your father's inhaling food/fluid and developing potentially lethal complications from that.
2. Has the therapist explained the risk to your father? Let's say yes, she has.
3. Has your father understood what the therapist explained? - do you think he has? Is the therapist satisfied that he has?
4. Given that he understands the risk, your father is still free to make his own choices about what to eat. The therapist can advise, recommend, and prescribe appropriately; but once she has done that she has fulfilled her professional obligations. If your father chooses to disregard her advice, that's up to him. He may be required to sign a disclaimer.
The therapist's attitude to you is unfortunate, but you would do best to assume that she believes she is acting in your father's best interests and continue to try to work with her. Is there any room for compromise? - for example, can you adapt your home cooking so that it meets the SLT's prescription?
My dad hated it. He didn't live all that much longer anyway. If I had to do it again I would let him eat regular food (within reason) so he could at least enjoy eating his last weeks. He may have died sooner, but died happier.
Aand, report the speech therapist to the director of the facility. There is no need for her to be rude.
But... I saw him choke on food once, about a year before he went into the nursing home. I called 911 because he wasn't breathing. My mom gave him the Heimlich while I was on the phone, and it worked. But it was terrifying. He was terrified. We could see that in his face. My nephew was 3 at the time and he saw it all, and he still worries about "I hope Grandpa doesn't choking..." every time his grandpa eats something around him.
So my advice is this... you deserve to be treated with more respect but maybe consider that the therapist does have your LO's best interests at heart, just misguidedly, and if you bring him food... be with him when he eats it. That's what we do.
And my father's NH does have him eat lunch and dinner in a supervised dining room where some people are fed by staff, assistance is provided for troubles cutting and opening, and is next to the nurses' station, I assume in case of an emergency. Maybe your LO's place has a room like that?
1. I understand the perception that medical professionals are here to serve patients and their families. Most of the ones I've met are really here b/c they WANT to care for people; there is a difference, but it's not a cavernous one that can't be crossed. And sure, there are others who have different reasons, but they still deserve respect for their knowledge and training, which we don't have.
However, they're not servants; they are educated professionals and deserve to be treated as such. For anyone who disagrees, reread the posts and note the difference in perspective, calmness and rational analyses of their responses.
2. Liability, as has been stated. During a 20 year period during which both my parents and my sister were in short or long term (several months) recovery or rehab at a total of over a dozen facilities, we always worked out potentially contentious or similar issues, except at one facility which was so bad we decided to find another place by the end of the first day.
I won't deny that it wasn't always easy, but the rewards were better working relationships, better care, and happier families.
These are perhaps some of the most challenging times families face, and it's not easy finding a safe and navigable path, but it's worth the effort. Unfortunately, some of what I've read this morning doesn't reflect that dynamic.
3. I'm sure that no facility is going to want to accept, adhere to and contribute to conditions which jeopardize a patient's health. Why should they?
It may jeopardize their Medicare reviews and standing, as well as medical standards in the community for similar situations (this relates to malpractice standards).
4. Not only would a liability release likely be required, but I'm sure there would be an indemnification, hold harmless and defend clause as well. If you're not familiar with this, you should be aware that it's a type of exculpatory release. If anything did, or when it does happen, you have no claims against the facility for any issue, unless the clause specifies selected issues which typically isn't the case.
I'm not a proponent of medical malpractice litigation, especially since I've worked for Med Mal firms and seen how attorneys attempt to make cases out of unfortunate situations. But you should be aware that in effect you're waiving any rights you might have for issues even totally unrelated to dysphagia (assuming the indemnification is as broad as I suspect it would be.)
5. I think the more likely case from any kind of refusal action is that the facility will advise that they (a) need the room and (b) no longer have space for your father; (c) Just advise you bluntly that failure to cooperate with medical advice makes you an unwanted participant, and (d) they do not wish to care for your father any longer.
Luisa, think seriously about this kind of misguided "advice."
I want to extend support though for those who actually have been through a dysphagia sequence and understand the risks. These are the people whose advice should be heeded.
It's also unfortunate that this whole concept isn't clear to everyone. Please try to locate a video demonstration of the effects of aspiration, and worse yet, of cyanosis. If you haven't seen someone choking to the point that his/her face turns red, or worse yet, blue, you need to if you think it's that easy to ignore and/or reject medical recommendations for dysphagia diet and precautions.
Even w/I defined dysphagia levels, situations vary. Milk shakes & ice cream are good examples. When more solid, they can be acceptable, based on the guidelines (which anyone caring for someone with dysphagia MUST read). W/I a few minutes, as they begin to melt, they are no longer acceptable.
My take would be to try foods that he likes and put them in the blender with just the right amount of water or bone broth to achieve the correct thickness. Limit the rate of consumption as that will also lead to choking. That also happened to my father-in-law. Make sure they have actually swallowed the last bite and are not just collecting food like a chipmunk.
The problem is that the speech therapist is trained to assess the swallow. If the swallow is not good food passes from mouth to trachea and bronchi instead of to the esophogus and into stomach. As a simple explanation. That food, going into the bronchial tubes is fed into the lung where it cause almost instant "Aspiration Pneumonia." Google "aspiration pneumonia" to give you a good overview.
I am sorry you are being treated with rudeness. You are desperate to save the person you love AND make life worth living for him. You should be treated with respect. The Therapist should be drawing you pictures and explaining the very real complications involved. And the assessments should continue now every few weeks.
You don't give us any details here. Who is this person you love. How old. What has happened to cause this problem.
I am so sorry for your grief. You will, I guess, have to get your information over the internet about swallowing and the dangers thereof. That shouldn't be the case. Remember to speak gently and calmly; don't let it get into the realm of a power struggle, because you are fighting for the rights and well being of the one you love, and you need to go at this as a team, not as enemies.
Love out to you and hope you will update us.
The trick here is to work with the therapist. With mom, we prepared all sorts of her favorite foods and altered them to meet the required consistency. Then the tests were repeated at regular intervals and we all adjusted. We also worked closely with other clinicians when mom was in rehab to alert them to dietary restrictions.
I know it's difficult to partner, but in order to do so effectively, we need to understand the "why" and then work together creatively on the "how." With your efforts in synch with the clinicians, you can achieve great results.
Facility/Speech therapist: Speech therapy does the evaluations and gives diet based on how the client performs. If client has swallowing problems - and it seems your LO does - then speech tests to see which diet is safest for client. She should be asked to perform another swallowing evaluation - and you NEED to be present. She would prefer if you would bring foods recommended for your LO swallowing performance. If you insist on bringing foods your LO has "failed" to swallow well, you set LO for aspiration pneumonia or dying from asphyxiation. She has an obligation to make sure her clients suffer no harm.
Family: Your LO prefers food from home, naturally. Family want to provide comfort and "treats" for their LO when they come to visit. No facility can provide the quantity for foods needs and the flavor/texture profiles preferred - so families "help out".
My take: Ask for another swallowing evaluation and be there. Work together with the speech therapist to talk about what foods you can safely bring for your LO.
It is difficult, but recommendations need to be followed for your loved one safe swallow. A lot of aspiration is silent, no cough as it travels to lungs.
With my DH, he would have to "double swallow" every bite because not all the food would go down - then he would breathe and the food wasn't going where it's supposed to go.
You don't say where your LO is, so I can't say who you need to talk to. But I can tell you, if something you bring to him makes him choke to death, you will have to live with that for the rest of your life.
My DH only had to have "nectar" thickness so that left us with a lot of options. You can take regular foods and use a food chopper to make them the right texture for safe eating. I only had to make sure everything was in small enough pieces so he wouldn't choke on them.
Tread very carefully here - one wrong step and you will feel the guilt. BTW, I finally found a thickener that worked on soda for him and he was able to have one a day - Hormel makes it.
Pureed food may be canned food that already comes in puree form, or it can prepared from fresh food using a food processor. I suspect that he doesn't like the first. If it's the latter, the food may lack condiments that make the food appetizing.
I would suggest not giving him regular food but preparing it in puree form after it's been cooked.